Bloom

가장 활발하고 솔직한 AI 커뮤니티

000
KoEn

Could AI really automate even that?

What was discussed

Could AI really automate even that?

Yoon Seok-ho introduced himself as a content curator rather than a founder. Daytrip started from the observation that taste has no standard. People know intuitively what looks good and where they want to go, but there was no systematic way to find those places. Before the pandemic, he built a format that bundled five to ten Seongsu-dong spots into cards with white text on top. The format you now see everywhere on Instagram started there.

Trust, he said, comes from what you leave out. He turns down roughly 70% of the ad proposals that come in. Post one mediocre place and the unfollows start immediately, and the trust lost that way costs more than the ad fee. He watches saves and shares rather than likes. A save carries close to four times the weight of a like, and content that makes people file a place away for later outlasts content about where to go right now. He also noted that the first 10 minutes after posting determine 80% of a post's performance.

As AI came in, the team shrank sharply from twenty people. Five years of posts, follower reactions, and regional and seasonal patterns are now handled by AI. The turning point was realizing that an editor's individual instinct, which accounts they follow and which trends they catch first, could be turned into data. The team got smaller while the coverage got wider, and the US channel reached 280,000 followers in a year and a half. He was candid about the limits too. You can predict what a Korean visitor in New York will like, but the tastes of local Americans or Japanese visitors are hard to model until the data accumulates.

Hwang Ju-yeon opened by distinguishing a solution engineer from a salesperson. Instead of walking through product specs, the job is to get in the car with the customer and build something together. She named three reasons AI stalls inside enterprises: nobody knows where the data is, columns with identical names mean different things, and even once you find and define them, there is nothing telling the AI how to stitch them together.

The second problem was the biggest. Whether a revenue figure includes taxes and returns, and whether the fiscal year starts in January or July, changes the answer. A product code lives in the database as a number, but users search for it by its Korean name, its English spelling, or a typo. So before you attach AI, she said, you need a layer that aligns meaning. Beyond that, if you do not spell out the relationships connecting promotions, products, revenue, and reviews, the AI will return wrong answers to any question that has to hop across several steps.

The real bottleneck, she said, is organizational rather than technical. Systems built four or five years ago are already legacy, the people who designed them have left, and those who remain do not know why it was built that way. So instead of relying on what the customer can explain, she works backward from the queries left behind in dashboards and workbooks, builds a quick prototype, and shares it with the working teams first before taking it up the chain.

The Amorepacific case was concrete. The project started two years ago, not as a data warehouse migration but as preparation for using AI, and today agents actually run in marketing, sales, and revenue analysis. Early on, though, they struggled by trying to handle 1,000 tables at once. Narrowing to the 100 most-used tables and splitting those into five groups of twenty-three, each with its own agent, unblocked it. Start narrow, then widen was the lesson.

That flips the usual order. Rather than accumulating data first, you have to define the goal first. Saying you want to use AI to grow revenue is like picking lottery numbers. Be specific, such as verifying that a purchase order came in correctly or checking whether a product complies with regional regulations, and the data you need falls out of that. Over the next two to three years, she expects no all-purpose agent that does everything, but a growing number of function-specific agents that connect to each other.

The closing story stuck with people. An older CFO had been writing strategic ideas by hand in a notebook, and once those notes were moved into digital form and given structure, they became an agent as they were. Context that has been organized becomes an agent; context that has not just sits there. In the end, the two sessions arrived at the same place. The limits of AI come not from the technology but from whether you have put your data in order.

Read the full write-up

Event video

Gallery

Could AI really automate even that?, photo 1Could AI really automate even that?, photo 2Could AI really automate even that?, photo 3Could AI really automate even that?, photo 4Could AI really automate even that?, photo 5Could AI really automate even that?, photo 6Could AI really automate even that?, photo 7Could AI really automate even that?, photo 8Could AI really automate even that?, photo 9Could AI really automate even that?, photo 10Could AI really automate even that?, photo 11Could AI really automate even that?, photo 12Could AI really automate even that?, photo 13Could AI really automate even that?, photo 14Could AI really automate even that?, photo 15Could AI really automate even that?, photo 16Could AI really automate even that?, photo 17Could AI really automate even that?, photo 18Could AI really automate even that?, photo 19Could AI really automate even that?, photo 20Could AI really automate even that?, photo 21Could AI really automate even that?, photo 22Could AI really automate even that?, photo 23Could AI really automate even that?, photo 24Could AI really automate even that?, photo 25Could AI really automate even that?, photo 26Could AI really automate even that?, photo 27Could AI really automate even that?, photo 28Could AI really automate even that?, photo 29Could AI really automate even that?, photo 30Could AI really automate even that?, photo 31Could AI really automate even that?, photo 32Could AI really automate even that?, photo 33Could AI really automate even that?, photo 34Could AI really automate even that?, photo 35Could AI really automate even that?, photo 36Could AI really automate even that?, photo 37Could AI really automate even that?, photo 38Could AI really automate even that?, photo 39Could AI really automate even that?, photo 40Could AI really automate even that?, photo 41Could AI really automate even that?, photo 42Could AI really automate even that?, photo 43Could AI really automate even that?, photo 44Could AI really automate even that?, photo 45Could AI really automate even that?, photo 46Could AI really automate even that?, photo 47Could AI really automate even that?, photo 48Could AI really automate even that?, photo 49Could AI really automate even that?, photo 50Could AI really automate even that?, photo 51Could AI really automate even that?, photo 52Could AI really automate even that?, photo 53Could AI really automate even that?, photo 54Could AI really automate even that?, photo 55Could AI really automate even that?, photo 56Could AI really automate even that?, photo 57Could AI really automate even that?, photo 58Could AI really automate even that?, photo 59Could AI really automate even that?, photo 60Could AI really automate even that?, photo 61Could AI really automate even that?, photo 62Could AI really automate even that?, photo 63Could AI really automate even that?, photo 64Could AI really automate even that?, photo 65Could AI really automate even that?, photo 66Could AI really automate even that?, photo 67Could AI really automate even that?, photo 68Could AI really automate even that?, photo 69Could AI really automate even that?, photo 70Could AI really automate even that?, photo 71Could AI really automate even that?, photo 72Could AI really automate even that?, photo 73Could AI really automate even that?, photo 74Could AI really automate even that?, photo 75Could AI really automate even that?, photo 76Could AI really automate even that?, photo 77Could AI really automate even that?, photo 78

Next event